diff --git a/killswitch.py b/killswitch.py
index c89d7ace..7863a388 100644
--- a/killswitch.py
+++ b/killswitch.py
@@ -277,6 +277,25 @@ class KillSwitchSet:
         log.info('Rules applied successfully, allowing execution to continue')
         return False, new_data
 
+    def check_multiple_killswitches(self, data: UPDATABLE_DATA, *names: str, log=logger, version=_current_version):
+        """
+        Check multiple killswitches in order.
+
+        Note that the names are applied in the order passed, and that the first true
+        return from check_killswitch causes this to return
+
+        :param data: the data to update
+        :param log: the logger to use, defaults to the standard EDMC main logger
+        :return: A tuple of bool and updated data, where the bool is true when the caller _should_ halt processing
+        """
+        for name in names:
+            should_return, data = self.check_killswitch(name=name, data=data, log=log, version=version)
+
+            if should_return:
+                return True, data
+
+        return False, data
+
     def __str__(self) -> str:
         """Return a string representation of KillSwitchSet."""
         return f'KillSwitchSet: {str(self.kill_switches)}'
@@ -465,6 +484,11 @@ def check_killswitch(name: str, data: UPDATABLE_DATA, log=logger) -> Tuple[bool,
     return active.check_killswitch(name, data, log)
 
 
+def check_multiple_killswitches(data: UPDATABLE_DATA, *names: str, log=logger) -> tuple[bool, UPDATABLE_DATA]:
+    """Query the global KillSwitchSet#check_multiple method."""
+    return active.check_multiple_killswitches(data, *names, log=log)
+
+
 def is_disabled(id: str, *, version: semantic_version.Version = _current_version) -> bool:
     """Query the global KillSwitchSet#is_disabled method."""
     return active.is_disabled(id, version=version)
diff --git a/tests/killswitch.py/test_killswitch.py b/tests/killswitch.py/test_killswitch.py
index ebbae1b1..cda672ac 100644
--- a/tests/killswitch.py/test_killswitch.py
+++ b/tests/killswitch.py/test_killswitch.py
@@ -73,3 +73,21 @@ def test_operator_precedence(
     kill.apply_rules(cpy)
 
     assert cpy == result
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize(
+    ('names', 'input', 'result', 'expected_return'),
+    [
+        (['no-actions', 'delete-action'], {'a': 1}, {'a': 1}, True),
+        # this is true because delete-action keyerrors, thus causing failsafe
+        (['delete-action'], {'a': 1}, {'a': 1}, True),
+        (['delete-action'], {'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}}, {'b': {}}, False),
+    ]
+)
+def test_check_multiple(
+    names: list[str], input: killswitch.UPDATABLE_DATA, result: killswitch.UPDATABLE_DATA, expected_return: bool
+) -> None:
+    """Check that order is correct when checking multiple killswitches."""
+    should_return, data = TEST_SET.check_multiple_killswitches(input, *names, version='1.0.0')
+    assert should_return == expected_return
+    assert data == result