Symphonia is not actually that slow...

This commit is contained in:
CDrummond 2025-03-15 09:24:52 +00:00
parent e4522cc683
commit 00be6015f7
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ unless these libraries are statically linked in.
`ffmpeg` whilst slower then `libavcodec` produces a more portable application. `ffmpeg` whilst slower then `libavcodec` produces a more portable application.
`symphonia` also produced a more ortable application, but is *much* slower to decode `symphonia` also produced a more portable application, but is slower to decode
files, and does not produce identical analysis results. Therefore, it is not advisable files, and does not produce identical analysis results. Therefore, it is not advisable
to mix files nalysed with `ffmpeg` (any varaint) and `sympnonia`. to mix files analysed with `ffmpeg` (any variant) and `symphonia`.
## Build for 'ffmpeg' command-line usage ## Build for 'ffmpeg' command-line usage

View File

@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ use any `ffmpeg` version.
If the package used ended with `-symphonia` then `bliss-analyser` has been built If the package used ended with `-symphonia` then `bliss-analyser` has been built
with the `symphonia` libraries. This allows a more portable binary, but at a with the `symphonia` libraries. This allows a more portable binary, but at a
*much* slower decdoding speed (and anlysis results are not the same as those slower decoding speed and produces analysis results that are not the same as
produced by `ffmpeg`/`libav`). those produced by `ffmpeg`/`libav`.
Quick guide Quick guide