mirror of
https://github.com/psy0rz/zfs_autobackup.git
synced 2025-04-25 23:02:12 +03:00
performance tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
9fad773bfb
commit
01f0078ccf
24
README.md
24
README.md
@ -377,9 +377,29 @@ Snapshots on the source that still have to be send to the target wont be destroy
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance tips
|
||||
|
||||
* --no-holds and --allow-empty improve performance a lot if you deal with large amounts of datasets or snapshots.
|
||||
If you have a large number of datasets its important to keep the following tips in mind.
|
||||
|
||||
### Speeding up SSH
|
||||
#### Some statistics
|
||||
|
||||
To get some idea of how fast zfs-autobackup is, I did some test on my laptop, with a SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNI-L2B0B disk. I'm using zfs 2.0.2.
|
||||
|
||||
I created 100 empty datasets and measured the total runtime of zfs-autobackup. I used all the performance tips below. (--no-holds, --allow-empty, ssh ControlMaster)
|
||||
|
||||
* without ssh: 15 seconds. (>6 datasets/s)
|
||||
* either ssh-target or ssh-source=localhost: 20 seconds (5 datasets/s)
|
||||
* both ssh-target and ssh-source=localhost: 24 seconds (4 datasets/s)
|
||||
|
||||
To be bold I created 2500 datasets, but that also was no problem. So it seems it should be possible to use zfs-autobackup with thousands of datasets.
|
||||
|
||||
If you need more performance let me know.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Less work
|
||||
|
||||
You can make zfs-autobackup generate less work by using --no-holds and --allow-empty.
|
||||
|
||||
This saves a lot of extra zfs-commands per dataset.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Speeding up SSH
|
||||
|
||||
You can make your ssh connections persistent and greatly speed up zfs-autobackup:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user